A MESSAGE TO: ALBERT SINGER; COUNTY ATTORNEY (PRETENDER); WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I am requesting that you instruct your client, Julie Riggins of Child Protective Services (CPS) to cease and desist forwarding her harassing emails to me. On the morning of Wednesday July 13, 2011, your client Julie Riggins forwarded an email to me which contained pictures of my children. She states “Joseph and Benjamin were adorable” and describes how “cute” Hannah looks. On July 14, 2011 I received another email containing four more pictures of my children from your client taken while they were out and about shopping and spending the day together. Is she serious? This is quite offensive! I know better than any of you how wonderful my children are, how adorable they are, and how cute they are. I also know that I spend every waking minute, of my days and nights (usually into the early hours of the morning) fighting for their lives. I don’t need the likes of some CPS “product acquisition agent” sharing with me the joys of her experiences with them. What are these; “Proof of Life” pictures? Since their abduction your client has already secured a Ransom of $142.50 from me every two weeks for the supervised visits, by threat of “NO FUTURE CONTACT.” Although I cannot afford the visits, I absolutely cannot afford to allow for the possibility of further damage to them emotionally or mentally. Not having contact with their father would devastate them as the visit reports have shown… There is no telling, until I can have them examined by a TRUE professional, what damage has been done by keeping them from their mother for last 11 months.
Later that morning July 13, 2011, during the scheduled visit with my children they were proudly describing how “Ms. Julie got us haircuts”… This, after I gave “Ms. Julie” $CASH$ during the last visit on June 29, 2011 when my girls expressed “to me” that they wanted haircuts (the $CASH$ was refused and returned to me by your client). Clearly, this exemplifies your client’s continuing efforts to alienate my children from me and proves that while in your client’s custody they are being reprogrammed to believe that the FAMILY concept should be redefined as “flexible.” i.e. By your client’s definition, a FAMILY certainly does not require a father, and in our case, apparently does not require a mother since your client has successfully distanced our children from their mother for the past year plus. In fact, maybe a FAMILY is just a social worker and her “pretend family” which she acquired “under the color of law” while misleading the “KANGAROO COURT,” even conspiring with others to LIE and to MANIPULATE Evidence (CPS Court Reports) and Petitions to start with.
When I looked at these emails and the pictures contained in them, I felt my chest tightening and my heart rate increasing, as I became anxious and concerned about how Ms. Riggins might want me to interpret what I was seeing or how I should react. I found myself measuring each thought carefully to avoid being overcome with stress. Of course I find sending these pictures to be totally and completely inappropriate, absolutely unnecessary, and constitute nothing less than harassment. She even sent them to me on the morning of the day I was to visit with my children (only a few hours prior). Why? I can take my own pictures… I am not interested in her sharing the “joy” she is experiencing with my children while on her “play-date” with them. Is she torturing my wife with the same?
I further ask that Julie Riggins no longer take pictures of my children for any reason, and that she destroy the pictures she has acquired to date. I understand that she has likely compiled a library, amounting to nothing more than a “digital trophy case” of her (and the agency’s) conquest of MY FAMILY. This request is applicable to anyone with access to my children other than my wife or myself.
Speaking of the visit, my children were also proudly displaying their new clothes “that ‘Ms. Julie’ bought us.” This after my repeated requests to be allowed to provide the proper support for them, as I did very willingly and very freely for the last 4 months of 2010 to the tune of over $6,000 - until your client refused to accept any more support, and of course has repeatedly refused to accept since January of 2011; in favor of the government’s Title IV-E and Title IV-D pyramid scheme $CHA-CHING$. There are not words to describe this heinous, despicable agency (oh, there’s at least two words I guess).
I therefore renew my request to provide this support directly per our previous arrangement in Aug-Dec of 2010. Of course I realize there is money at stake for your client as I very clearly understand your client’s desire to pursue their “profits” $CHA-CHING$ under the Title IV-E and Title IV-D entitlements, along with the “matching federal funds,” but I am sure you can easily understand my lack of sympathy in that area as my concerns are for the welfare, well-being and needs of my children, NOT YOUR CLIENT’S PROFIT MARGINS.
And I am also compelled to ask yet again that NO ONE discuss the issues in this case with my children. I am increasingly subjected to comments from all of my children during our visits about “court” and other elements of this case. This is quite disturbing as I continue my diligent efforts to shelter them from this fiasco created by you, your client, and the KANGAROO COURT system my family is trapped in. Although I am documenting these comments for use at a later time, I would prefer you instruct all those involved to exercise restraint by “leaving my kids out of it!”
What I would like from your client are the continued appropriate updates as to the welfare of all my children. Please advise as to how Hannah is doing in her “summer reading program.” Is she even involved in anything of the sort? It has been reported to me by your client that she has been kept back in school due to the incompetence of the current placement, the incompetence of the caregiver (as you and your client very well know, this 24-year-old was never qualified for such a task of taking on 7 children ages 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, & 15), and the weak public school system itself; not to mention that Hannah and all my other children were thrust into this mess over a year ago by your agency! Oh and then there’s the $300 Hooked-on-Phonics kit that I provided at the start of the school year (at your client’s request – to help Hannah with her reading) which was ultimately returned to me “unopened” 4 months later with your client stating; “the caregiver did not have the time to administer the program.”
At the end of the day you are ALL culpable and will be held accountable.