| Bar ID | 6379 | ||
| Name | Mr. Albert J. Singer | ||
| Address | P O Box 550 | ||
| City | Raleigh | ||
| State | NC | ||
| Zip | 27602 | ||
| Work Phone | 919-856-5500 | ||
| Fax | 919-856-5504 | ||
| Licensed | 9/1/1974 | ||
| Status | Active | ||
| Discipline | 1 public discipline document(s) found.
|
Looks like this guy is a repeat offender… Don’t miss this Letter of Reprimand against Mr. Singer!!! Let’s everyone remember that where there is one reported/documented complaint, there is likely at least ten times that amount in existence.
Defendant Al Singer, Assistant County Attorney, Attorney for Wake County Human Services
Defendant Albert Singer, Assistant County Attorney being herby named in both his individual and official capacities is an individual and a resident of this jurisdictional district is a county attorney for Wake County, North Carolina and was at all times material, pertinent and relevant hereto. Current mailing address is; c/o The Wake County District Attorney’s Office, PO Box 550, Raleigh, NC 27602. The Defendant was in fact, acting under the authority or color of state law at the time these claims occurred in that while in his official capacity as the County Attorney for Wake County his execution of, The Wake County District Attorney’s Office’s “customs” and/or “policies” were the moving force behind his unconstitutional acts and was in fact, acting under the authority or color of state law at the time these claims occurred in that he often acted “out of court” personally and individually in an investigatory capacity. The Supreme Court reasoned that “out of court” activities of the prosecutor did not implicate judicial functions as immediately as the decision to prosecute (or the presentation of a case in court) bolstering its conclusion that historically, absolute immunity did not accompany such administrative or investigative functions of the prosecutor. Burns v. Reed (1991) and Kalina v. Fletcher (1997). In addition, he did act under the authority or color of state law when he acted in concert with local officials, including but not limited to, WCHS social workers, their supervisors, and others, causing harm to the Plaintiffs in effecting the deprivation of rights, Dennis v. Sparks (1980).
COUNT I; VIOLATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT – Due Process Clause as to procedural due process, substantive due process, and suppression of evidence
There has never been any actual proof, real evidence, or even the perception of the existence of any evidence, yet under the leadership of WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer, they all continued to pursue efforts to remove my 7 minor children. WCHS was well aware of the declaration and legal position that the DVPO was in fact void and obtained in a manner inconsistent with Due Process. In other words they knew early on that no abuse had ever occurred in our family home. Furthermore WCHS regularly referred to written allegations, a document provided by my wife that she later recanted and denied its validity under oath at a Non-Secure Custody Hearing held on June 30, 2010. My wife also testified in a Non-Secure Custody hearing on June 30, 2010 that she coached the children with the document while in California in order to prevent me from executing my Ex Parte Temporary Custody Order to bring my children home. Any reasonable person, official, agent, or agency could see the document was a compilation of lies, exaggeration, and made up of embellished and dated circumstances that never rose to the level of abuse or neglect. Throughout the document were statements by my wife such as; “I was at work at the time” and “I was told the next day.” And virtually every allegation was without a date but indicating ages of the children to wit: the allegations were to have happened years earlier (not months, weeks, or days); convenient for someone who does not want to be questioned about details. Years earlier, makes it much more believable to answer questions with; “I don’t remember.” Immunity is defeated if the official took the complained of action with malicious intention to cause a deprivation of rights, or the official violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known, McCord v. Maggio, (5th Cir. 1991). WCHS has been provided with several documents refuting any possibility that abuse could have ever occurred in the family home. My wife herself produced at least 2 documents titled “why I left my husband” and “how the abuse allegations got out of control,” detailing how and why she fabricated allegations of abuse and how she further “coached the children” as needed, to no avail. She further revealed in detail her true motive as to why she left the family home in March, 2010. None of this was of any concern to WCHS, its social workers, their counsel Al Singer or any of the other officials involved in this case. They were in too deep and the cash machine (my 7 minor children) was well in hand. I have vehemently and adamantly denied the nature and veracity of any of the allegations made with regard to neglect and abuse from the start of this case (from day 1) to the present. I have produced multiple documents from a “formal custody evaluation” that was ordered by a Florida Court and conducted after similar allegations of abuse made to Florida Department of Children and Families, from estranged family members and in connection with a custody battle between my wife and the father of her first 2 children (my stepchildren). The result of the evaluation as it pertains to me is as follows; “Evidence of Domestic Violence or Child Abuse. There is no credible evidence of such. The department of Children and Family Services have investigated the matter and deeded the allegations unfounded. Mother has recanted the allegations and the children have denied them. In the six years that Mother and Mr. Reale have been together, these are the only allegations. Mr. Reale’s explanation of the events is credible and rational. Church members of significant community status have not seen any signs of abuse or controlling behavior on the part of Mr. Reale. In contrast, Mr. Reale is described as a loving, Caring, productive member of the church and a family man.” This was after a complete investigation (30 days) and interviews with me, my wife, our children, and approximately 18 teachers, church members, and other family. In a Florida DCF Abuse Report, the final disposition states; “There have been no findings of family violence threats to children, or any other physical injury. Family seems stable; parents are in counseling, children not at risk. Case Closed.” Some of these false, unsubstantiated, and previously refuted allegations have even been re-introduced in this current case by WCHS – in 2010 (8 years later), but no one seems to want to pay any attention to this fact. There has been a predetermined “path of least resistance” from the beginning by CPS and others related to this current case to satisfy their own agenda. FRAUD! Plaintiffs were arguable deprived of their right to procedural due process because the intentional use of fraudulent evidence into the procedures used by the state denied them the fight to fundamentally fair procedures before having their child removed, a right included in Procedural Due Process. Morris v. Dearborne (5th Cir. 1999)
COUNT II; VIOLATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT – Due Process Clause
In the absence of Due Process once again WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer even took unilateral steps contrary to a 2002 Florida Court order Granting sole physical and legal custody of our son TRB (my stepson) to my wife Debra. The order prohibited visitation between Timothy Griego and TRB and further ordered child support in the amount of $340 per month. The child support arrears have grown to well over $125,000 as none was paid between 2002 and 2009. WCHS and their counsel Al Singer made contact with Mr. Griego, conspiring with him, assigned him a court appointed attorney, and immediately included him in the current proceedings for reunification with TRB, the son he and abandoned 16 years earlier without due process or even the slightest investigation; that would have revealed, among other things, that Mr. Griego once attempted suicide, that he abandoned his 2 children at the age of 1 and 6, that he never even attempted so much as a Birthday Card, and that he does not care about their well-being only how they may be able to benefit him financially. It was only after my wife’s persistence that she was finally able to get a garnishment order from the State of California where Mr. Griego resides. The garnishment was in the amount of approximately $700 to $800 per month which she only began to receive in mid-2009. WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer also took control of this garnishment for current child support which included arrears payments in the amount of $400-$500 per month to forward to the current caregiver of TRB. I presented a parent’s report at a follow-up hearing in October 2010 objecting to WCHS’ and their counsel’s efforts to redirect these arrears payments. My request was basically ignored and nothing was resolved. WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer continue their efforts to reunify TRB with Mr. Griego, this dead beat dad, who abandoned his children and never made any attempt to support them throughout the past 16 years. Our family has ever been afforded the benefit of Due Process on this matter.
COUNT III; VIOLATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT – Due Process Clause
There are also some basic, verifiable truths about this cased and the accused (me), that have been provided yet clearly have been ignored by WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer and its other agents, as it was contrary to their agenda. In the community I am, and always have been, an active member of my church, even joining a mission trip to Honduras to build a church in 2007 and another recent trip to Guatemala in June 2011 with 2 more scheduled for later this year in July and November of 2011. I served my country as a UNITED STATES MARINE for 8 years. I have worked in the same industry as a leader for over 22 years; I have countless people who will stand up for my character in these environments. I have never done any type of drugs in his entire life. My wife and I (social drinkers at the time) decided back in 2001 to remove any alcohol from their home and to stop drinking entirely for the benefit of our children. I have never been arrested or charged with a crime. I havn’t been in as much as a fight or any type of physical altercation with another human being in well over 20 years, displaying zero violence in any way over that same period of time. My children have never been to the emergency room for any so-called “abuse” related injuries (very few medical issues in general, in fact). They have never even sustained injuries of any kind resulting from discipline or anything of the sort that could even be construed as abuse or neglect. The police have never been to our family home for domestic violence or any other reason through 16 years of marriage, living together and raising our family. I have absolutely never laid a hand on my wife in any way whatsoever, nor pondered a thought. My children have always been well-behaved and respectful of each other, neighbors, members of their church family and their other friends and co-workers. What is wrong with this picture?
In July, 2010 my 7 minor children were set up with a mental health intake assessment per the policy of WCHS. Allegations of the children experiencing nightmares and fear of me were later reported by WCHS in their Court Report dated July 28, 2010. There were further claims that the children may be suffering from “post-traumatic stress” due to the alleged abuse. To this day the children have been in so-called therapy through WCHS and have been diagnosed with “Adjustment Disorder,” a residual disorder that was clearly caused by WCHS, its agents and other officials.
COUNT IV; VIOLATIONS OF THE FOURTEETH AMENDMENT – Due Process Clause as to Suppression of Evidence
WCHS, by and through their counsel Al Singer have repeatedly denied me access to any documentation generated by CPS and its agents. I have a right to these documents. Withholding constitutes a clear deprivation of rights and is evidence of a conspiracy to cover up the truth concealing the very documents that would contribute to the real truth. I have made repeated requests (multiple emails and in person) for the entire CPS file, among other things that relate to notes, emails and other written communication. DENIED! I asked for a copy of the Psychological Evaluation requested by WCHS, Ordered by the Court, and conducted by one of their contracted employees, Dr. Yoch. DENIED! I have requested, also on multiple occasions (emails and in person) an “Adverse Psychological Evaluation” by an independent licensed practitioner at my expense for my minor children, to properly address and or diagnose the possibility of “Separation Anxiety,” affects or symptoms of “Parental Alienation,” or “Adjustment Disorder.” DENIED! I have requested access to all copies of medical records pertaining to the treatment of each of my minor children, including but not limited to physical health, mental health, and even dental records. Specifically with regard to mental health I requested names of evaluators, diagnosis (if any), treatment modality, method of assessment, etc. DENIED! Plaintiff’s clearly established right to meaningful access to the courts would be violated by suppression of evidence and failure to report evidence. Chrissy v. Mississippi Dept. of Public Welfare, (5th Cir. 1991)
Continued from… CPS DEPRIVING VISITS; COACHING CHILDREN!!
Hard to believe, but the emails kept on comin’ and these despicable, insidious characters continued their back-peddling and continued to conduct their damage control; even suggesting they might “withdraw” their motion – AGAIN! What sort of games are they playing “with my children’s lives?” Where did they ever get this power?
From: Albert Singer
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:14 AM
To: Michelle Congleton
Cc: EXPOSINGTHERECORD.ORG
Subject: RE: Upcoming hearing
This is about the children. The motion for review was to give the children a chance to speak with the judge. It’s not a formal hearing…but a review. It is not a motion to suspend visitation per se. There’s been a lot of back and forth about what they do or do not want; this is an opportunity for them to air their feelings to the judge without going through an emotional whirl. If folks want to turn this into an inquisition then we’ll probably dismiss the motion. Remember this is social work with a judicial overlay, not the other way around. Having the children speak with the judge about the visits might clear up some of the existing confusion. I believe children are entitled and able to express their feelings about visits without going through the ringer.
Of course I had to respond to this ridiculous rhetoric for the last time (at least for this round)…
From: Ron Reale
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 1:35 PM
To: ‘Albert Singer’; ‘Michelle Congleton’
Subject: RE: Upcoming hearing
WHEN THE PEOPLE FEAR THE GOVERNMENT, THERE IS TYRANNY; WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FEARS THE PEOPLE, THERE IS LIBERTY! THOMAS JEFFERSON…
Mr. Albert Singer (County Attorney)
The damage control in your emails is highly offensive, but typical. You are nowhere near working on behalf of my children. You have always been all about yourself. You prove it every time you enter the courtroom. And not just in this case. I have seen your reprimand; and I believe in the “old adage” where this is one documented, justified complaint, there are at least ten more (Unless you subscribe to JUDGE BOUSMAN’S philosophy; “just because you are found innocent, doesn’t mean you didn’t do it”… So I guess the reverse would apply to you; just because you were reprimanded, does not mean you actually did anything wrong???) You consistently bring the full-force of your ego, rhetoric, and of course your ever popular inappropriate BANTER into the courtroom. It is an embarrassment to our entire system! I hesitate to say this because I do not want it to come across as sarcasm, but you should really consider “acting” full-time as a career move since you enjoy the theater so much. In my opinion, and in relating my thoughts to my experience with you in this case, you are a serious distraction to the courtroom and of little benefit.
As to your characterization of my right to request a subpoena as an “inquisition,” you should be ashamed of yourself. This is a typical display of your contradiction in terms. You purport to be representing my children and seem to describe efforts to “clear up some of the existing confusion” but then describe their father’s pursuit of the truth to be an inquisition? Remember sir, that I filed these subpoenas, in part, due to your own clandestine approach to the so-called review hearing. This approach of yours is in keeping with your approach to this entire process from the beginning; and is just one reason I do not trust you and likely never will.
As to your making mention of this “confusion” that exists. I have been attending visits with my children for over 5 months now. You – yourself, CPS, the Guardian ad Litem, and others have always been welcome to participate in observing the visits. None of you have ever even requested this. Another contradiction purporting to “want” to clear up any “confusion about the visits” yet you haven’t taken the very simple steps to address this. Join us in the visits and see for yourself; but you might not like what you see since it WILL NOT serve your agenda well!
I am not playing these games any more with any of you! You have deliberately, cohesively, and quite happily it seems, destroyed my family! It will take years to repair the damage you have caused. I will be relentless in my pursuit of justice and my pursuit of tearing down these “walls of secrecy” that exist in your so-called self-described “social work with a judicial overlay” (thanks for the great blog title). I have growing support from members of the State Senate and other state level politicians, members of the local and national media, grassroots organizations, and other non-profits locally and nationally. I have already begun networking and joining forces with other well-established organizations dedicated to bring down these very same walls. ExposingTheRecord.org is now being followed on Twitter and Facebook, (and of course the dedicated website), and soon to be on T-Shirts and other social media venues. I have plans for interviews and will make myself available for as many as I need to. You will soon see me on our very courthouse steps promoting change. CHANGE IS COMING! I will be a very conspicuous figure in educating the public as to what I know about some of our District Court Judges in next year’s upcoming election. YOU ALL STARTED THIS; and I’d like to say I will be a part of finishing it; but it will be a very long process so I can only say I WILL BE IN IT FOR THE DURATION!
I will agree with you on one thing though… Michelle Congleton is exactly right; in fact, she is a genius in the midst of this CHAOS. It’s amazing what a few words can say about a person. I HAVE MUCH RESPECT FOR THOSE WHO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THEIR CONVICTIONS…AND SPEAK UP. It is incumbent on all of us to “stir the pot” when it comes to the lives of innocent children no matter what side you are on. I think in was a dollar’s worth! Thank You MICHELLE! It is however extremely offensive to see you, Mr. Singer, try to piggy back on her words. I have some thoughts on following up with her suggestion that I will share with her in the next few days.
I AM TRULY INDIGNANT! I PLAN TO PLAY A VERY LARGE ROLE IN THE YEARS TO COME IN RESTORING THE BROKEN SYSTEM THAT I FOUGHT WITH HONOR TO DEFEND AS A US MARINE!
WHEN THE PEOPLE FEAR THE GOVERNMENT, THERE IS TYRANNY; WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FEARS THE PEOPLE, THERE IS LIBERTY! THOMAS JEFFERSON…
Preserving the Record…
Ron Reale, Executive Director; ExposingTheRecord.org
My Testimony
After reading the reprimand on Mr. Singer, it leaves me with a sick feeling! He is the attorney that has been “advising” WCHS through this process over the past year regarding my grandchildren. Now I understand how things were omitted and conveniently left out! How many other families has this man turned upside down and destroyed?? I hope and pray that there is someone who sees through his charade. HE CALLS HIMSELF AN ATTORNEY??? PLEASE, PLEASE…SOMEONE FIX OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND START by getting rid of attorneys the LIKEs of Al Singer!!! These are the lives of innocent children he has so frivously used to maintain his position not giving them a second thought or the damage he has caused!!!!!!
I know Mr. Singer from personal experience, he had social worker Rachel Johnson falsely accuse me of being sexually aroused around my daughter. But if this were true then Rachel Johnson would’ve had to been fantasized about my privates for more than 25 min. he also stated that I had been masturbating in the social worker’s bathroom, when I had gone to the bathroom at a visit. And when I was stupid enough to follow the advice of my lawyer Yolanda Broddie, he had conveniently left out the fact that she had given me the advice in the first place, and that Yolanda Broddie had failed to subpoena a witness are even call said the witness. Though it was not clear at the time to me, it is now perfectly clear that Mr. Singer had some foreign perjury, committed conspiracy, and knowingly filed false documents in my case. This had not been the first time that he had done this in this case. With my wife he had falsely accused her of stocking Kimberly Newsome, the wake County social worker working on our case. This stocking incident happened at the parking lot just opposite the courthouse where they have cameras set up. Neither of my wife’s attorneys had notified her of this charge until 33 day after the incident. The parking lot only keeps records or tapes for 30 days, isn’t that convenient. Mr. Singer knows that he can use the law as a weapon and then hide behind Judge Boseman’s robe like the coward he is. These public defenders have no loyalty to their clients they only care about getting paid. In my case, I had filed a complaint with the North Carolina bar against Ms. Broddie for failing to take responsibility for her device and failing to subpoena the witness I needed. The North Carolina bar ultimately came back that Ms. Broddie had technically not done anything wrong. Mr. Singer gets a sick and perverse pleasure from destroying families, separating fathers from daughters, sons from mothers, and the brothers from sisters. My son has not talked to his sister in over three years, yet this is in the best interest of the children. The truth of the matter is that this is in the best interest of the social worker, the therapist, wake County human services, the Guardian ad litem program, Albert J Singer, and Judge Boseman to name a few. It is important that everybody know that the best way to get rid of an incompetent lawyer is to file a complaint against said lawyer. It is also very important that everybody rate their lawyers at the following websites: http://www.lawyerratingz.com http://www.avvo.com and http://www.ncprorce.com. By rating your lawyers at these websites, you will expose their true nature and may be able to take away any profit they get by destroying families and selling their clients out. Plus it helps you feel better even though it doesn’t bring your family back. In addition, you may also read your judge at the following sites: http://www.ratethecourt.com or http://www.ncprorce.com.
It is important to note just how corrupt Judge Boseman’s court is. I had written a complaint to Sen. Hagan about the conduct of Judge Boseman. Not only did I have to write it twice and she did not answer the first one. When she did get around to finally answering it the letter from her office stated that “our office is unable to help you wish you complaint regarding your grandchildren”. Keep in mind that I have no grandchildren and that my letter to her, which is posted at the bottom, had no mention of grandchildren. Sen. Hagan office also stated in a phone conversation to me that they had lost all of my attachments even though they had been sent twice and that they had not read my complaint. I had made the mistake of enclosing a complaint I had with the social worker’s board against the therapist in my case who had twice from my daughter and the Butler mental health facilities, most likely after she had told her that she would never see her brother, mother, or father again. Before I had been contacted by Sen. Hagan’s office I had gotten a letter from the social worker’s board stating that they had dismissed my complaint. When I inquired as to why they had dismissed it Mr. Ferriss sent me a letter stating “This is in response to your phone message today requesting an explanation of how the board reached its decision to close this matter after you submitted a new complaint with additional materials. Unfortunately, I may not discuss this matter with you. The only part of ethics matters that are public record are the evidence presented at a hearing. Final Agency Decisions issued after a hearing, or when a case is closed by consent Order. Unsubstantiated complaints, as these were, are confidential. I regret that I cannot assist your further, and wish you the best.” I will also post the complaint at the bottom of the page.
I read these letters that are posted at this website the Senators and Congressmen and I can guarantee you that the response will read something like this. Unfortunately we are unable to help you with your complaint because this is not a federal issue. If you’re writing to your Sen. or Congressman you have to have something that makes it a federal issue such as the County budget that shows either the percent are the actual dollars that the federal government is subsidizing child protective services. What is needed is that meet up groups need to be started in each and every city where CPS is out-of-control. Have demonstrations at the Guardian ad litem, social services, at the County commissioners meeting, and in front of the courthouse to name a few.
From the following complaint should go to see that I am not the best writer however I do write good enough to where they could understand. You will also see just how corrupt the system is and how far up this the corruption goes. I truly believe that Sen. Hagan got together with the governor and made that complaint I had filed against the therapist go away. I believe this because the first complaint against said therapist resulted in the therapist having her license suspended but not revoked. And I did not have nearly as much evidence as I had in the first one as I had in the second. In addition how can a senator not read somebody’s complaint and lose all the attachments not once but twice. As of now this is not to say that Senator Hagen does not care for disabled Veterans, it does say that she cares more for corrupt judges and criminal attorneys like Albert J Singer. All of these politicians rather they be Republican or Democrat know they got a problem with CPS; they just do not want to fix it. Please read the following complaints and see if they will be helpful to you should you decide to file a complaint thank you for your time.
12 August 2009
Dear Senator: Hagan
Nationwide, there are state run agencies who are supposed to be protecting abused children in dangerous situation. However, here in North Carolina, in the Case of CPS (Child Protective Services) of Wake County there is clear evidence that CPS and the courts which support are abusing the parents and the constitution in the process. What make this especially troubling for me as a disabled veteran are two factors that Wake County Human Services is getting substantial Federal funding, which enable WCHS to operate (see attachment 1, Wake County Budget estimate), and false allegation of being sexually aroused around my daughter were made against me. The second one is especially troubling because it is one hundred percent not true and the assistant County Attorney Albert J. Singer has a letter of reprimand for misconduct in child custody cases (see Attachment 2).
One needs to look at the letter from WCHS dated 8 January 2007 (see attachment 3) and the court finding for the 22 February (Attachment 4), and the finding for 20 March 2007 (see attachment 5). Yet, when one look at the finding for the 8 May 2007 hearing one can see that the story has changed, why (see attachment 6)? Could it be that I filed a complaint, against my attorney Ms. Boddie who not only failed to subpoena a Witness at a critical time but did not even phone him. She also did not own up to her advice in the findings, which made it sound like I just accepted the letter of 8 January 2007 as fact. Ms. Boddie threw me under the bus, in order to advance her career (see attachment 7 and 8 complaint to bar and motion to amend or correct the findings from court date 8 may 2007). The only question is whether Ms. Boddie is corrupt or just incompetent? At any rate the Bar in its Country club fashion found no fault with her. Not surprising when one looks at what they did with Albert J. Singer. It is no wonder that attorney in North Carolina believe that any tactic is acceptable to winning a case. One more point before moving on, there is no doubt that had I not put Ms. Boddie on report that I would be on a department of justice sexual predator list today, and Ms. Rachel Johnson who made the allegation in the letter of 8 January 2007 was never seen or heard from again. I also found someone to listen to me at WCHS; however, Brian Gunter, went back to accusing me of sexual misconduct (see attachment 9). But, if the of 8 January 2007 is to be believed why did Rachel Johnson continue the visit for an addition 30 minutes, perhaps she was fantasying, or does it just make more since that she lied at the request of Mr. Singer (see attachment 10)? This is way Social worker needs to be licensed, in order to have independent over site. By the why Ms. Newsome, was in Mr. Wampler office my VA therapist, just two days earlier stating that she would do everything she could to make sure that I could maintain contact with E.H. it is now clear that this was just a ploy so that I would lower my guard, in other words to set me up (see attachment 11, Ms. Newsome complaint to the NCSWLB).
One of the other results of the alleged incident was Ms. Pirri tried to use blackmail tactics against me.
During the 20 March hearing she stated that if I confessed to being sexually aroused around E.H. then I would be allowed to see E.H. Ms. Pirri had to know that this was a lie. Ms. Pirri is currently under investigation for her conduct in this case (see attachment 12 and 13 Ms. Pirri’s complaint and the response to said complaint). Mr. Singer most certainly knew that this was a lie, and the Judge Bousman knew that this was a lie, but no objection for Ms. Boddie was made. In fact, I would see Ms. Boddie talking to John Averi, the Guardian ad Litem quite often. However, Ms. Boddie would not report back to me what was said.
John Averi did fill a false report with the court, the Guardian ad Litem report (see attachment 14) stated that the compliant that I had filed against Tracy Pirri was dismissed without merit when in fact it had been dismissed for lack of evidence. If I had had access to the court transcripts the outcome would have been different I believe. During his testimony given on 4 January 2008 John Averi stated that Ms. Pirri sent him email to that effect stated the complaint was dismissed without merit (see attachment 15 John Averi’s testimony). Weather John Averi lied in his report; he certainly did not call the Social Worker Board he never called me. How well could anybody do an investigation if they only talk to one body, in this case WCHS? Ms. Pirri certainly lied, weather she sent the emails or not she never came forward and denied the fact of his report (see Tracy Pirri’s Testimony attachment 16). Yet, both Ms. Pirri and Mr. Averi words our taken as fact whether they or said or written.
The next point that I need to touch on is the supper cozy relationship between the Judge Bousman and the Guardian ad Litem Program. As one can see from the Guardian ad Litem newsletters (see attachment 17), Judge Bousman has a good relationship between with the GAL Program. Judge Bousman swears in lots of Gal’s volunteers, she give lots of awards to the GAL’s, is invited to the GAL functions, dinner, luncheons, farewell and commencement address, and is extended sympathies when a loved one dies, and no doubt has good friendships there. Since that are no advocate for the parent that can do the same how is one going to get a fair hearing or have the expectations of a fair hearing in front of such a judge or the administrator of the Guardian Ad Litem program? During the hearing Judge Bousman would allow Tracy Pirri to introduce evidence at hearing on the court date without objections; however, would always object if the parent did the same before grudgingly allowing it in, why? Judge Bousman’s courtroom was an absolute disgrace to all the men and women that have made sacrifice for this county. First and foremost because she had a convicted liar writing the finding of the court (Mr. Singer), which often time did not match what she had said in court. If Mr. Singer were anything other than a lawyer would be in jail. False allegation being taken as fact, not just against me but also against Wanda, for example, Wanda was accused of stocking Kimberly Newsome the Wake County Social Worker in the parking garage across from the court house; however, the only person that tried to get the tape from the parking garage was Wanda (see attachment 18). But, in Judge Bousman’s courtroom one is guilty until proven innocent that is why Mr. Singer did not get the tape. The question is, if the innocent happened why would Mr. Singer or Kimberly Newsome not want to get the tape our fill out a police report? Given Mr. Singer’s record it just make more since that Mr. Singer is lying, after all if Wanda continued to stock Ms. Newsome. Mr. Singer would have to show evidence in criminal court, would he not? Why was it that Wanda only received notification after 30 day when the tape had been erased? Why was it that her attorneys set on these allegations for more than four weeks? Judge Bousman also enter into evidence answer to question that had not even been asked, for example, after I bought up that E.H. and T.H. had not communicated in over a year. Judge Bousman enter into the record that communication with me would be no different even though I had not been asked the question, and base on my communication with my son T.H. which were about once a week, what a fair judge! I would also like for you to look at the complaint to the Judicial Standard Commission it is clear that Judge Bousman is in violation of Cannon one and three (see attachment 19). As well as the North Carolina code of Judicial Conduct (attachment 20) and Judicial Standards FAQ’s (attachment 21). The next reason is those transcripts are not made for all the hearings! I tried to get the transcript for the February though May 2007 hearings, but Windy Kirwan (919) 792-4875 the Wake County coordinator for special proceeding, stated that transcript are not made for these types of hearings. All hearing need to have transcript make. Otherwise corrupt attorneys and Judge can just make up fact as they see fit, which happened multiple times, and the court appointed attorneys where either grossly incompetent or corrupt in the case on Ms. Bobbie, or a spineless wonder in the case of Mr. Taylor (see attachment 23) failure of Mr. Singer to provide finding from the 14 December 2007 hearing. Clearly these attorneys only care about getting paid and will do whatever the Judge tells them to do, as the Judge controls who is appointed to each case. The end result was that I had no idea what Mr. Singer had written and that was fine by Mr. Taylor.
Since the hearing there has only been one phone call between T.H. age 7 and E.H. age 10; this lack of contact has not been in the best interest of the children. However, it has been in the best interest of WCHS and Tracy Pirri. Since the false allegation of sexual arousal did not go as planned there has been a need to cover it up. T.H. (age 7) was even out here in Raleigh from Austin TX, but WCHS could not make time for E.H. to see him.
Now I not saying the WCHS does not care about children, but WCHS cares more about cover up its actions; this is why it did not have the care givers or foster parents of E.H. in court at the TPR hearing this is why no charge where filled for filling a false report against the GAL after I showed the letter from the Social Worker License Board that stated that my first complaint had been dismissed for lack of evidence, instead of it being dismissed without merit. It is not in CPS interest to state to the adoptive parents that they took a child from disabled veteran that does not make them a hero, but make the allegation that he or she is a sexual pervert that makes the case worker a hero and everyone attached to the case a hero. Perhaps they might even get an award for their actions or get stories written about themselves as was the case with John Averi (see attachment 23 spot light on John Averi. Since there is no accountability for CPS’s action why not hire dirty lawyers with letters of reprimanded and no morals, and why not let all lawyers go to the GAL function as well Judges, the more the merrier. I would also like to ask the following questions, why is it wrong for parent to use the tactics outline in (PAS) or Parental Alienation Syndrome (attachment 24 and 25 Tracy Pirri’s Complaints), but it is wonderful when the state does it. You have my permission to contacted Mr. ****** of the VA Raleigh outpatient clinic (919) ***-****. He is familiar with this case; also you also have my permission to contact my sister at (((***. One final remark WCHS or Kimberly Newsome sent us me, my sister, and Wanda a tape of E.H. final good bye. However, these where blank DVDs, even now Ms. Newsome wants to play games (see attachment 26, Kimberly Newsome email to me). Is this just the most incompetent person on the planet? Or is she just playing a cruel joke to get back at me for filling a complaint against Tracy Pirri or perhaps there is something in the DVD that is damaging to Ms. Pirri? However after three and a half months it is a sure bet that it will never come, though I am sure she has a good explanation, which Ms. Newsome should be required to give, but without independent oversight it will never happen.
I would like for you to do if possible.
1. See about restoring visitation and reuniting her with me.
2. If not possible then making sure that the adaptive parents know the full circumstances and the kangaroo nature of the court. After all there is a letter of reprimand Attorney writing the findings and quite possible a letter of reprimand therapist.
3. Do a full investigation of Wake County Human Service and remove all federal funding, which has been more than three million dollars a year for several years now.
4. Do not allow judges to run, swear in, give award too, be invited to, or participate in any Guardian ad Litem functions.
5. If a judge has run the Guardian ad Litem program than the judge should not be allowed to hear cases for ten years after because of the friendships and contacts that have been made.
6. Transcript must be made for all hearing and court appearances then distributed with the findings. This insures and will protect all parties there was several hearing in which the finding did not even come close to matching the happing in court. I did not get the TPR transcript until December, why did I have to wait simple because my case went to appeal?
7. No Government attorney, or for that matter any government employee may have a letter of reprimand in their field of work. Yes I had a county attorney with a Letter of Reprimand in Multiple cases, and he did make false allocations. Mr. Singer should not have been allowed to have his job after only one day. The fact that Wake County hired such an Individual tells me that anything goes.
8. There need to be a penalty for false allegation. Once I was accused of being aroused around my daughter it ended any change of cooperation. CPS wins! My case was lost in the February 2007 hearing period.
9. Jury trial at TPR hearings. Judge Bousman had already made her mind up long before the TPR hearing, and Jury are not invited to GAL Functions as a rule.
10. Prison terms for knowing filling false reports, mandatory for attorneys.
11. Prison terms for blackmail tactics.
12. Statistical analyst of how a judge rules available to the public.
13. Licensees for Social Workers, the North Carolina Social worker Board only license for therapist not for social workers therefore there is not independent oversight of social workers.
14. The Parents need to have access to all medical record the whole time of the hearing.
15. This is not a federal issue; however, it is undermining the courts the North Carolina Bar in a country club, Mr. Singer is proof of that no way should he have a law license. But, as long as the Bar is made up off just lawyers on the gravies committee the Bar will remain a country club. Therefore it is of high importance that the Bar does like other license boards and be made up of 50% lawyers and 50% non lawyers. And for god sage ban all letter or reprimand holders from having government jobs.
16. Give the parent a choose of where to have visitation at CPS or at an approved child supervision site, like Any Child Can.
17. Make the continued participation of attorney in the program based on a client review or survey, in this way the court might avoid yes men and women that just want to please the judge, often at their client expense.
Thank you for your time and attention. I have written My State Senator and Representative with no replies. I have also spoken before the Wake County Commissioners no response as well. No state or county agency or official in going to restore the constriction or integrity to the law in North Carolina unless they have to.
Respectfully William A. Hudson
16 April 2009
To: North Carolina Social Worker Board
From: William A. Hudson
2634 Calculus lane
Raleigh, NC 27603-5971
Subject: Ethical conduct of Traciann W. Pirri (License Number C005156) of Wake County Human Services
This is a follow up to the complaint, which was filled on 5 June 2007 (see Attachment A). That complaint was dismissed for lack of evidence and that might have been the end to this matter. However, Ms. Pirri knowingly lied to John Averi, Wake Counties Guardian ad Litem for E. H. (see Attachment B the Guardian ad Litem report and Attachment C, page 426 John Averi testimonies dated January 4, 2008). The Guardian ad Litem report stated that the complaint of 5 June 2007 was dismissed without merit, and in testimony given on 4 January 2008 John Averi stated that Ms. Pirri sent him an email that stated that the complaint was dismissed without merit. At no time did Ms. Pirri come forward to correct the Guardian ad Litem report, either verbally or in writing (see Attachment D Ms. Pirri testimony dated 11 December 2007), and if Ms. Pirri is so bold as too lied about this matter, which has a Paper trail, is it not unreadable to believe that Ms. Pirri would lied about other things as well. Undoubtedly if Ms. Pirri gets a criminal conviction of perjury against Mr. Averi then it would be safe to say that Mr. Averi lied, short of a criminal convection, any change in Mr. Averi testimony should be highly suspect. Mr. Averi should have no dilution that any changes in his testimony will have severe penalties or consequences. Mr. Taylor my attorney only asked this question under pressure from me. I did not think it was necessary at the time to give him the obvious follow up questions such as, so Tracy Pirri lied to you and why did you not call the Social Workers Board for their opinion of the complaint of 5 June 2007? Judge Bousman gave Mr. Taylor an angry look and, Mr. Taylor came back to the table angry and upset. Mr. Taylor showed no courage when standing up to judge Bousman, at this time or in subsequent events.
I would also like to introduce new evidence to support my original complaint that Ms. Pirri committed conspiracy. To support this allegation I would like to submit assistant Wake County attorney Albert J. Singer letter of reprimand (attachment D). Needless to say the North Carolina Bar is more concerned with the welfare of unethical and incompetent Attorneys then it is for the public welfare and safety. After reading Mr. Singers letter, my question to the Bar, is what does one have to do to lose a law license? Another question is why would WCHS want this man to represent them? It is clear that when Wake County Human Service decided to bring false allegation against me that they did not pay attention to the inconsistencies in the report (see Attachment F letter dated 8 January 2007). Also see the finding for the 22 February 2007 (Attachment G), 20 March 2007 (Attachment H), and 8 May 2007 (Attachment I). You will notice that the May finding do not match at all with the February finding, why?
I infer the reason for this was to cover up the incompetence and gross negligence of Ms. Boddie, my attorney at the February hearing (see Attachment J). I guess the Truth can change regardless of the facts. Please note that transcripts from the February, March, and May hearing are not available; I tried to obtain then from the county clerk’s office. However, according to Windy Kirwan (919) 792-4875 the case coordinator for special preceding, transcript are not made for these types of hearings! It is little wonder that Mr. Singer, Ms. Pirri, and other thought that these accusation would move through the judicial process without objection. Another reason that taints this case is the extraordinary and corrupt relationship that the Judge has with the guardian ad Litem program. This issue was addressed by my complaint to the north Carolina Judicial Standard Commission (see Attachment K), North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct (see Attachment L), Judicial Standards FAQ’s (see Attachment M), and the Wake County Guardian ad Litem Newsletter (see Attachment N). In the newsletters, you can discern a cozy relationship between the Judge and Guardian ad Litem seen in award ceremonies, swearing in of new Guardians ad Litems, and special dinners and luncheon’s. When a Judge receives that kind of treatment on a regular basis, it is not unreasonable to expect an unbiased ruling, is it? I tried to investigate this further by calling the North Carolina Justice Center (919) 856-2570; however, I was informed that information on this matter could not be released. The reason given was that it might hurt children, but how could any information regarding the integrity of the court be hurtful to children they claim to protect?
A final point E.H. (age 10) has only talk to T.H. (age 7) once in the last year and a half. T.H. lives in Texas with my sister Barbara Hudson, (***) ***-**** or (***) ***-****. T.H. was in Raleigh once, but WCHS could not arrange a time for the children to meet. Even though WCHS states contact between siblings is in the children’s best interest, efforts at contact have been halfhearted at best. This has the effect of distancing the children emotionally, as well as their geographic separation. WCHS has not come out and stated that it is in the best interest of E.H. to sever all contact, although the actions of WCHS indicates that this is their goal. I do believe that WCHS want to saver all contact as a means of covering up there and Ms. Pirri actions. Ms. Pirri should explain her action in this matter, and explain why it is in the best interest of E.H. to have no contact with her little brother?
You have my permission to contacted Mr. ****** of the VA Raleigh outpatient clinic (***) ***-****. He is familiar with this case. Also I did not receive the transcripts until December 2008, thank you for your understanding and attention.
RESPECTFULLY WILLIAM A. HUDSON
NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT
Sworn and subscribed before me this the ___________________________________________________
Day of__________________________________________________________________________, 2009
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(Notary Public)
My commission Expires_____________________