Isa 10: 1-2 1 Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, 2 to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.
Judge Monica Bousman (not so honorable)
Judge Lori Christian (not so honorable)
Judge Jane Gray (Appellate Court Hopeful?)
Judge Robert Rader (Chief District Court Judge)
My Testimony
I am currently assisting someone who has been convicted after Judge Herbert J. Exarhos literally falsified numerous court documents in a criminal case. Also, on July 07, 2011, I was contacted by an attorney in a civil case who her client suffered the same type of fraud by judge Exarhos, who is in San Diego, California. This Judge is corrupt to the core. A move to have him taken off the bench is underway. James.
What happened with the case?
Every state needs to network to find all the victims, many who do not have a voice. Unethical and immoral judges are in every state, follow the money as this is the root of evil, almost all judges try to hide their assets or form of payment by unethical lawyers and court appointed people, search county records for property loans. See avivakbobb.com for yet another dirty judge. search facebook for other victims which you can find at http://www.facebook.com/robertagettinger In CA we have fulldisclosure.net and the Richard Fine story about a judge David Yaffee who was caught accepting bribes and had put in jail for 18 months in an attempt to shut him up. This same tactic was done to me by Aviva K. Bobb who is retired but still influencing police to hide the murder of Lee Peters http://www.estateofdenial.com/2011/03/22/police-involvement-in-conservatorship-issues/ Lets all network and share info, these judges MUST BE EXPOSED
This is the real scoop of what is happening to the unrepresented citizens. Below is the actual letter sent, without exposing my address Please feel free to post this letter. I sent it to the Court of Appeals. Lindsey Stewart
September 12, 2011
RE: Appeal No. 37-2011-00200192 Cl-UD-CTRl
37-2010-00035610-Cl-UD-EC
RE: Letter Not- Dated from Appeals Clerk-Superior Court of El Cajon (attached-enclosed)
To APPEALS CLERK:
Please take notice that this letter serves as a formal complaint against the Appeals Clerk in Superior Court of El Cajon. After six months of waiting to file our opening brief, Appellants each received an undated letter on September 10, 2011 notifying us that exhibits will not be part of the clerk’s transcript under California Rules of Court 8.224[1]. Appellants did in fact designate the exhibits in their amended designation of record, back in March 2011.
Additionally, and equally disturbing to our denial of a timely appeal process, is a denial of our request for transcripts of the February 15, 2011 Hearing that took place in Department 17 between the Clerk of Judge H.J. Exarhos Kay Fahey and Plaintiff’s attorney Gregory Borman, and Plaintiff’s agent Luis Naranjo, while Defendant Lindsey Stewart waited outside the courtroom. Clerk Kay Fahey emerges from the court room stating Judge Exarhos is denying the February 14,2011 cashiers check for the rent, as per Judge Exarhos’s February 7,2011 minute order. Appellants on September 10, 2011 are informed that this hearing was off the record. The decision by Clerk Kay Fahey in exparte communication with Plaintiff’s attorney and agent lead to the eviction of three members of a family, which remain homeless because of this action. The February 15,2011 off the record hearing is believed to be appealable.
In closing, Appellants are requesting that exhibits that were part of the record below be made part of the clerk’s transcript, as well as the letter enclosed/attached from the Superior Court of El Cajon. We have yet to receive the five volumes of transcripts promised by Maria on August 18,2011, the Appeals Clerk handling the appeal, at the Superior Court of El Cajon. Please investigate why we have until September 12, 2011 to provide a conformed copy of declaration of Gregory Borman, per undated letter.
Lindsey E. Stewart
Below is the letter from Superior Court of El Cajon
“To whom it may concern:
“In regards to the Designation of Record on Appeal the exhibits will not be included
as part of the Clerk’s transcripts. For any questions regarding this issue please refer
to California Rules of Court 8.224″
“Please also note that the following documents could not be located in the file
and unless a conformed copy is provided to the Appeals Division by 9/12/2011,
these items will not be included in the Clerk’s Transcript:
1) Declaration of Gregory J. Borman in support of opposition date filed 3/3/2011
2) Transcript requested of minute order from hearing on 2/15/2011 D-17
Judge H. J. Exarhos, was off the record; therefore, no recording was done.”
Appeals Division.
September 29, 2012
Judiciary Standards Commission
P.O. Box 1122
Raleigh, NC 27602
RE: Case Number 12CVD 4427 and 12 SP 1258
I am Michael Demetrius Hines, Jr., the father of Michelle Grace Perazzo, and I am writing this letter to express my frustration with the handling of the custody hearing at the Wake County Raleigh Courthouse. I am very concerned about the appearance of fairness in the handling of this administrative proceeding. In the beginning of February of 2012, my daughter’s mother and I were involved in a heated argument concerning her treatment of our infant daughter. At that time, my daughter’s mother would yell at our, then, 6 month old child and smoke marijuana around her. I was unwilling to condone the behavior, confronted her and as a result, our communication broke down for several days.
When I finally received a call from my Michelle’s mother several days later, she informed me explicitly that I would never see Michelle again and she did not want me in her life at all. She subsequently discontinued all communication and would not accept any of my phone calls. I made repeated attempts to communicate and even resorted to writing letters in an effort to maintain some level of civility so that I could have a relationship with Michelle.
Sometime in early March of 2012 I learned from a mutual friend that Michelle’s mother gave her up for adoption without notifying me. To this day, I have never denied being Michelle’s father as reflected in my facilitation of 1) the DNA paternity test in which the results confirmed that I am the biological father, 2) my name on Michelle’s birth certificate and 3) signed declaration to the Department of Revenue Child Support Enforcement of my intent to support Michelle financially and medically. This was an act of spite and malice from Michelle’s mother. It is also negligence on the part of the adoption agency, Amazing Grace Adoptions, whose staff and attorney had an obligation under North Carolina General Statute § 48:3 to make a good faith effort to properly notify me of my rights, but failed to do so in a reasonable and timely manner. It was not until I secured legal representation and filed a motion with the court that I was subsequently served notification by the adoption agency of a petition to adopt.
As Michelle’s father, I have rights and responsibilities when it comes to my daughter. North Carolina family law dictates that both mother and father are treated equally by the state’s court system, and that judges make decisions based on the best interests of the children. I believe I have not been treated equally and there is a concerted effort to intentionally delay having this custody matter heard. I believe there is an intentional strategy to continue delaying the hearing of this matter so as to give the adoption agency and Christian Life Home an unfair advantage to argue a best interest case in favor of the adoptive parents. I believe it is in Michelle’s best interest to be raised by me with the love, support and infrastructure from her uncles and grandparents where we reside in Cary. However, I do not have faith in the current state’s system given what I have experienced and how I have been treated by the parties involved – my daughter’s mother, the adoption agency staff and attorney, Christian Life Home, where my daughter’s mother resides, the adoptive parents attorney, who are now prematurely involved, and the state’s court system. I have been completely out-numbered by the number of people that have been allowed in the court room none of whom are for me, or look like me and my attorney. I, therefore, believe there is hidden bias resulting from behaviors that prevent them from managing this legal matter in an inclusive way and as a result, it is preventing me from being treated fairly in the current state court’s process.
I feel strongly that no one really cares how I feel about my daughter because all I ever hear is, “What does the mother want?” or “How does the mother feel?” but nothing in regards to Michelle’s need for security, stability, love, and identity which can only come from knowing her God-given, immediate paternal family. I love my daughter with all of my heart, and can and will provide for her all of which was presented to the courts. Michelle’s mother already gave her up her rights and was not fair in communicating that to me. She put her own self-interests above Michelle’s. However, I did not give up my rights and my interests are for Michelle. I would like an opportunity to raise my daughter.
I also believe that this custody case is motivated by money. When adoption agencies, like Amazing Grace Adoptions puts a baby up for adoption they receive payment in the amount of approximately $50,000. Also, the adoptive parents are compensated by the state until the child is 18 years old. So, my question is why are the parties involved fighting so hard against my motion for custody if they care so much about Michelle’s interests? How fair is it that the adoptive parents can hire an attorney BEFORE the adoption hearing to intercede even after the father has made his petition known? How can I get a fair shot at raising my daughter when Amazing Grace Adoptions personnel and their attorney take no responsibility for not properly following the law? There are a lot of statistics regarding absent fathers, but I do not have any intention of being one of them. How can I get a fair shot at demonstrating that if the process is already designed to work against me? I have not seen my daughter since February, and they have illegally had her for an extended period of time. What I know about the family is that they have several children of their own and now that I have made my intentions known, I think it is only fair they release all claim of petition to adopt my daughter.
Since this custody case has started, Michelle’s mother, the Christian Life Home and Amazing Grace Adoptions, have tried to do everything to get me removed from this custody matter. For starters, my daughter’s mother lied about the February 2011 incident which led to me being accused and arrested for assault on a female. Please keep in mind that I had recently took time off from college and had no prior record of any kind. What actually happened in February 2011 was that I tried to rescue my daughter’s mother from killing herself, who at the time threatened to jump off the second story apartment balcony during the first trimester of her pregnancy. My concern at that time was for my daughter’s mother and our unborn child. What I thought was a rescue attempt was turned into an accusation of domestic violence.
I was subsequently charged with assault on a female, false imprisonment and violating a court order. A young, African American male in love with someone outside of his race is still not easily accepted in society and not particularly in the state of North Carolina from my experience. Despite my daughter’s mother request to the D.A. that the charges be dropped, the D.A. wanted a show no leniency in support of the domestic violence laws. Fearing a heavy jail sentence, I opted to take a plea, plead guilty to the assault on a female, was given 2 years probation with a requirement to complete D.O.S.E. (anger management) treatment and Safe Child classes. I am not proud of this but the thought of going to jail certainly was not appealing.
As recently as June of 2012, my daughter’s mother and the Christian Life Home, concocted yet another story to get me once and for all out of my daughter’s life. My daughter’s mother visited me at work where I gave her permission to borrow my car until I got off work that evening. It was during this incident she threatened to call the police on me when I refused to submit to her irrational requests. She did not return my car that evening but unbenounced to me, drove to the court magistrate’s office and blatantly lied to have charges filed that I assaulted her, communicated threats and violated probation, which would have automatically given me one year in county jail. I was arrested again. She also filed a restraining order earlier that week and it was granted by Judge Worley, who is also the same judge presiding over this custody hearing. However, the D.A. (not the one from my first charge) read a letter my daughter’s mother emailed to me in which, by her own admission, stated that she had lied about the whole thing, indicated that the people in the magistrates’ office were dumb and accused Judge Worley of being stupid. Although I am forever grateful that the D.A. dismissed all three charges in that case, I feel there is no accountability being leveraged at the Christian Life Home or the house parents who appear to be partial toward certain girls at the home, or Adoption agency for all have had some level of direct and negative influence over my daughters’ mother to support a very deceptive agenda in making these false attempts to try and separate me and my family from my daughter’s life.
My family, my mom and dad in particular, have yet to see or hold Michelle Grace despite their longing desire. North Carolina law is not favorable toward the grandparents who want a right to be involved in their grandchildren’s lives. My parents have wisdom, years of experience raising six children and currently have five grandchildren. It is unfair to me that my parents were denied the opportunity to be intimately involved in decisions concerning Michelle Grace by the Christian Life Home, who claim to be guided by Christian principles and Amazing Grace Adoption. Michelle has a right to have a relationship with her God-given, biological grandparents, who are, in my estimate, much better examples of modeling Christian values of restoration and reconciliation in comparison to the Christian Life Home. Be aware fathers and expecting mothers, Christian Life Home is not who they say they are. I want Michelle to be raised in our home with my family where she can get to know her grandparents, aunts, uncles and numerous cousins. I love Michelle and can provide a warm, loving home for her. And what I lack in experience, my family is willing to support and strengthen me on through love and guidance.
I have also not been treated fairly by the adoptive parents’ attorney who have inserted themselves into the process, isolated me of having any support outside of legal representation in the court room and tried to turn over every rock in my personal life looking to establish me as unfit parent. It is unfair to unreasonably argue that my consent is not necessary and that my daughter can be adopted without it because of financial circumstances. The statute the adoptive parents’ attorney are using to make the argument is unfair and gives the birth mother too much say and unilateral control in what happens to Michelle when it took two of us to conceive her. I have taken the appropriate steps under G.S. 48 3 601 to establish that my consent is necessary. What has been conveniently overlooked is the fact that I have consistently kept a job during this fiasco, completed my D.O.S.E. treatment and Safe child classes and am determined to finish the last five months of the two-year probation sentence so that I can get my life back on track. Despite my probation, I feel that I have a strong case if I can get “a fair and impartial hearing before an unbiased judge.” This is elemental to the concepts of fundamental fairness inherit in administrative proceedings.
I have been fighting continually to get my daughter back. A motion was filed with the court in March 2012 requesting a hearing that my consent as the biological father is required. The North Carolina General Statute 48 2 206 specifically states that “promptly on receipt of the petitioner’s motion, the court shall set a date for the hearing no earlier than 60 days nor later than 70 days after the biological father received the notice required by subsection (a) of this section and shall notify the petitioner and the biological father of the date, time, and place of the hearing. To date, the hearing has been changed six times to October 10th of 2012.
While I refuse to bad mouth Judge Worley in this case, I want to make it clear that I am not confident in the Wake County court system. I am a registered voter but feel Wake County’s Family court system has failed me as a young African American father. The method of calendaring cases is illogical, unfair to the parties involved and unnecessarily prolongs serious and emotional issues. I have followed North Carolina’s law by way of acknowledging myself as the father described earlier, but am still denied my God-given, legal right and chance to father my little girl. I love my daughter Michelle with everything, and I deserve the right to raise her. Yes, I am young and I admittedly have made some idiotic and irrational decisions which I am paying for. But that should not supersede a father’s desire to rehabilitate himself, mature and love on his daughter. Let the record show that I am Michelle Grace Perazzo Hines’ father, Michael Demetrius Hines, Jr., and I would like to be given an opportunity to raise my daughter.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Hines, Jr.
Michael D. Hines, Jr.
603 Royal Tower Way
Cary, NC 27513
919-454-0389